Comments on: Argunet 1.2.0 released http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/ Open-Source Argument Mapping Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:26:29 +0000 hourly 1 By: admin http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-702 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:41:01 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-702 Yes, we are still using Argunet in our projects and will continue its development. I am not sure how long it will take to release the next version, so keep monitoring! ;)

]]> By: Johannes http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-701 Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:15:40 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-701 @admin/christian:
thx for the correction!
quick question: is this site/product still under development? just curious if it’s worth monitoring

]]> By: admin http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-700 Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:06:35 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-700 Hi, sorry for answering so late.
The last months, I had to neglect this site due to other projects. There was a WordPress bug that prevented the download page from being shown. Now it should be working again: Please visit http://www.argunet.org/download
to try it out.

regards, christian

]]> By: S.A.AHMED http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-699 Wed, 26 Jan 2011 02:11:19 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-699 I would like to try it out.

]]> By: steve simmons http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-698 Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:01:19 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-698 Correction to Entry No 10: Argunet does allow circular arguments
srs

]]> By: steve simmons http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-697 Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:16:57 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-697 This software provides a very simplified account of argument architecture.
The disadvanatge is one cannot model some of the complexities
of real life debate such as burden of proof, circular arguments, strength of arguments,argument schemas, admissibility, etc.
The advantage is the exceptional ease of use and clarity of argument relations.
On balance, for general use, I think the advantages outweight the disadvantages – so well done!
steve simmons

]]> By: adriana barraza http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-696 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:26:41 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-696 I want to try it because i need to organize my ideas! I use the freemind but i see they are differents.

]]> By: adriana barraza http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-695 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:24:26 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-695 I want to try it

]]> By: Alexander Heppt http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-694 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:55:03 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-694 Dear developers,

I think you are working a really promising project here and I would really like to download and try out the program. I’d also be happy to learn (much) more about you and the thinking that went into Argunet, both from an applied software perspective, and especially in terms of argumentation theory.

Thank you for your help and best regards,
Alexander Heppt

]]> By: adriana barraza http://www.argunet.org/2009/04/19/argunet-120-released/#comment-693 Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:35:22 +0000 http://www.argunet.org/?p=103#comment-693 I would like to try it!

]]>