<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Argunet &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.argunet.org/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.argunet.org</link>
	<description>Open-Source Argument Mapping</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Argument Mapping and Discourse Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.argunet.org/2015/02/06/argument-mapping-discourse-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.argunet.org/2015/02/06/argument-mapping-discourse-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregor Betz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argunet deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discourse analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoengineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.argunet.org/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Can we use argument mapping techniques to enhance empirical discourse analysis? In a recent talk at KIT&#8217;s Science &#8211; Media &#8211; Communicaton Lab, I presented our experience in merging argumentation-theoretic and empirical discourse analysis so far. The talk is documented in detail at the Science &#8211; Media &#8211; Communicaton blog, where you also find my [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org/2015/02/06/argument-mapping-discourse-analysis/">Argument Mapping and Discourse Analysis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org">Argunet</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we use argument mapping techniques to enhance empirical discourse analysis? In a recent talk at KIT&#8217;s <a title="WMK at KIT" href="https://www.geistsoz.kit.edu/germanistik/1054.php" target="_blank"><em>Science &#8211; Media &#8211; Communicaton</em></a> Lab, I presented our experience in merging argumentation-theoretic and empirical discourse analysis so far.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jkY5ijuCI4Q?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><span id="more-531"></span></p>
<p>The talk is documented in detail at the <em>Science &#8211; Media &#8211; Communicaton</em> blog, where you also find my slides:</p>
<p><a href="http://wmk-blog.de/2015/02/03/wmklauscht-gregor-betz-argumentrekonstruktion-als-diskursanalyse-ein-werkstattbericht/" target="_blank">http://wmk-blog.de/2015/02/03/wmklauscht-gregor-betz-argumentrekonstruktion-als-diskursanalyse-ein-werkstattbericht/</a></p>
<p>Thanks to WMK for inviting me and setting up the fine documentation!</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org/2015/02/06/argument-mapping-discourse-analysis/">Argument Mapping and Discourse Analysis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org">Argunet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.argunet.org/2015/02/06/argument-mapping-discourse-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engaging the Audience: Climate Engineering Talks and Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.argunet.org/2013/10/13/engaging-the-audience-climate-engineering-talks-and-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.argunet.org/2013/10/13/engaging-the-audience-climate-engineering-talks-and-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregor Betz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching & Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argunet deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.argunet.org/wordpress-argunet-2/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not obvious how to present an argument map that consists in dozens of arguments. That&#8217;s because, in a talk, you want to comment both on the macro structure of the debate, providing an initial overview, as well as on individual arguments featured in the map. The Argunet Editor is certainly not the ideal tool [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org/2013/10/13/engaging-the-audience-climate-engineering-talks-and-videos/">Engaging the Audience: Climate Engineering Talks and Videos</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org">Argunet</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not obvious how to present an argument map that consists in dozens of arguments. That&#8217;s because, in a talk, you want to comment both on the macro structure of the debate, providing an initial overview, as well as on individual arguments featured in the map.</p>
<p><span id="more-173"></span></p>
<p>The Argunet Editor is certainly not the ideal tool for giving a presentation. Traditional slides (created with PP, Keynote or Latex), too, are unsuitable for presenting huge argument maps.</p>
<p>In a talk I gave in Bremen in 2011, I simply used Mac OS&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preview_%28Mac_OS%29">Preview program</a> to display the <a href="http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/1000026042">Climate Engineering Argument Map</a>: I started by showing the entire map in fullscreen mode, and then zoomed in, moved the map, zoomed out, etc. as I commented on various subdebates and arguments. Shortly after the talk I learned about Prezi &#8230;</p>
<p>With zooming presentation software (such as <a href="http://prezi.com/">Prezi</a> or <a href="http://bartaz.github.io/impress.js/">impress.js</a>) things have become much easier. To me, these are ideal tools for giving a scientific talk or a popular presentation based on one of our argument maps.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1ETYgACfK6Y" height="315" width="420" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.eutrace.org/">EuTRACE project</a>, I went a step further. Using my presentations as a starting point, I created a series of screencasts, available at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLv79dU8x7PNNvn42BEW0jwO5wAS_deKHh">youtube</a>, that introduce the climate engineering controversy.</p>
<p>This is an attempt to disseminate argument maps by other means than mere texts or graphics. However, it&#8217;s not clear to me whether argument map videos really work. The EuTRACE project is still ongoing and the positive feedback so far is probably not representative.</p>
<p>So any comments or suggestions on presenting argument maps with Prezi/impress.js and in screencasts are more than welcome.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org/2013/10/13/engaging-the-audience-climate-engineering-talks-and-videos/">Engaging the Audience: Climate Engineering Talks and Videos</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.argunet.org">Argunet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.argunet.org/2013/10/13/engaging-the-audience-climate-engineering-talks-and-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
