Argunet Debates
Argument Map:3. What the Particularist Believes
This is a search-engine-friendly version of Argunet. To view the human-eye-friendly version please activate Javascript in your browser
Arguments
- Argument: : reasons are not arguments
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : knowledge of principles
- Argument: : Principles cannot vary contribution
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Implicit premiss
- Argument: : Analogy: Semantic purport
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Principles cannot consider everything
- Argument: : Example: Red and Blue
- Argument: : Breaking the law
- Argument: : Example: And
- Argument: : No clear distinction
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : other methods possible
- Argument: : Strange conception
- Argument: : application
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Invariant reasons possible
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : no other methods
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Invariant = no particularism
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Knowledge of practical purport
Argument Maps
- 0 A) Two Kinds of Generalism
- 0 B) Varieties of Particularism
- 0 C) Dancy's offensive argumentation
- 0 D) Dancy's defensive argumentation
- 1. Two conceptions of moral principles / 2. What the Particularist Does Not Believe
- 3. What the Particularist Believes
- 4. Problems for Absolute Principles
- 5. Problems for Contributory Principles
- 6. The Generalists' Reply
- 7. Do Particularism and Generalism Differ in Practice or Only in Theory?
- 8. Problems for Particularism
- new subdebate