Argunet Debates
Argument Map:6. The Generalists' Reply
This is a search-engine-friendly version of Argunet. To view the human-eye-friendly version please activate Javascript in your browser
Arguments
- Argument: : There are simple reasons
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Exception
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : All principles fail
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : enabling conditions necessary 2
- Argument: : Exception
- Argument: : inconsistent
- Argument: : First defense: Complex candidates
- Argument: : Second Defense a): Derived obligations
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Virtues not invariant
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Enabling conditions necessary
- Argument: : Second defense b): Virtues
Argument Maps
- 0 A) Two Kinds of Generalism
- 0 B) Varieties of Particularism
- 0 C) Dancy's offensive argumentation
- 0 D) Dancy's defensive argumentation
- 1. Two conceptions of moral principles / 2. What the Particularist Does Not Believe
- 3. What the Particularist Believes
- 4. Problems for Absolute Principles
- 5. Problems for Contributory Principles
- 6. The Generalists' Reply
- 7. Do Particularism and Generalism Differ in Practice or Only in Theory?
- 8. Problems for Particularism
- new subdebate