Argunet Debates
Argument Map:0 D) Dancy's defensive argumentation
Dancy's counterarguments (pink) against the critique of his position. Note that the two theses Dancy defends here also occur in the map "0 C) Dancy's offensive argumentation", namely in the top and in the bottom branch.
This is a search-engine-friendly version of Argunet. To view the human-eye-friendly version please activate Javascript in your browser
Arguments
- Argument: : Example: And
- Argument: : Rationality
- Sentence: :
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : reasons are not arguments
- Argument: : Learning
- Argument: : knowledge of principles
- Argument: : other methods possible
- Argument: : Particularists do learn
- Argument: : Material inferences
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Invariant reasons possible
- Argument: : Implicit premiss
- Argument: : Analogy: Semantic purport
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : no other methods
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : only principles represent knowledge
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Invariant = no particularism
- Argument: : Ethics not so special
- Argument: : Knowledge of practical purport
Argument Maps
- 0 A) Two Kinds of Generalism
- 0 B) Varieties of Particularism
- 0 C) Dancy's offensive argumentation
- 0 D) Dancy's defensive argumentation
- 1. Two conceptions of moral principles / 2. What the Particularist Does Not Believe
- 3. What the Particularist Believes
- 4. Problems for Absolute Principles
- 5. Problems for Contributory Principles
- 6. The Generalists' Reply
- 7. Do Particularism and Generalism Differ in Practice or Only in Theory?
- 8. Problems for Particularism
- new subdebate