Argunet Debates
Argument Map:8. Problems for Particularism
This is a search-engine-friendly version of Argunet. To view the human-eye-friendly version please activate Javascript in your browser
Arguments
- Argument: : Similarity
- Argument: : Ethics special enough
- Argument: : Anything goes
- Argument: : Rationality
- Sentence: :
- Argument: : Rule-Like authority
- Argument: : Backsliding
- Argument: : Special pleading
- Argument: : Learning
- Argument: : Unruled authority
- Argument: : No empirical proof
- Argument: : Particularists do learn
- Argument: : Persons of particularity
- Argument: : Constraints for action
- Argument: : Particular constraints
- Argument: : Look again
- Argument: : Persons of principle
- Argument: : incorrigible error is the worst of all worlds
- Argument: : Ethics not so special
Argument Maps
- 0 A) Two Kinds of Generalism
- 0 B) Varieties of Particularism
- 0 C) Dancy's offensive argumentation
- 0 D) Dancy's defensive argumentation
- 1. Two conceptions of moral principles / 2. What the Particularist Does Not Believe
- 3. What the Particularist Believes
- 4. Problems for Absolute Principles
- 5. Problems for Contributory Principles
- 6. The Generalists' Reply
- 7. Do Particularism and Generalism Differ in Practice or Only in Theory?
- 8. Problems for Particularism
- new subdebate